![]() Support spanned the political divide, including Republicans (69%), independents (60%), and Democrats (59%). Īccording to a Jsurvey by Pew Research, 61% of Americans supported drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia. Meanwhile ,47% supported President Trump’s decision to order the strikes that killed Soleimani and others. Fewer people believe signing international agreements (29%), sanctions (23%), or military intervention (17%) are very effective. 3 drone strikes that killed Iranian Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani, found that 35% of Americans agree that drone strikes are a “very effective way to achieve US foreign policy,” an increase from 23% in 2015. The United States also has the right under international law to “anticipatory self-defense,” which gives the right to use force against a real and imminent threat when the necessity of that self-defense is “instant, overwhelming, and leaving no choice of means, and no moment of deliberation.” Read MoreĪ Jan. Harold Hongju Koh, JD, Professor of International Law at Yale University and former US State Department Legal Adviser explained, “a state that is engaged in an armed conflict or in legitimate self-defense is not required to provide targets with legal process before the state may use lethal force.,” and a country may target individuals in foreign countries if they are directly participating in hostilities or posing an imminent threat that only lethal force can prevent. Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia have officially consented to US drone strikes within their countries because they are unable to control terrorist groups within their own borders. The UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary, or arbitrary executions has said that Article 51 applies if the targeted state agrees to the use of force in its territory, or the targeted group operating within its territory was responsible for an act of aggression against the targeting state where the host state is unwilling or unable to control the threat themselves. ![]() Īrticle 51 of the UN Charter provides for a nation’s inherent right to self-defense when it has been attacked. The AUMF states that the President is “authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.” The AUMF does not have a geographic boundary, and the Obama administration notes that al Qaeda militants far from the battlefield in Afghanistan are still engaged in armed conflict with the United States and therefore covered under the law. Additionally, in 2001 Congress passed the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), authorizing armed conflict with al Qaeda and associated forces indefinitely. ![]() Presidential powers under Article II of the US Constitution allow the use of force against an imminent threat without congressional approval. Pro 2 Drone strikes are legal under American and international law. Drone strikes eliminate all of those risks common to “boots on the ground” missions. Such pursuits may pose serious risks to US troops including firefights with surrounding tribal communities, anti-aircraft shelling, land mines, improvised explosive devices (IEDs), suicide bombers, snipers, dangerous weather conditions, harsh environments, etc. Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and their affiliates often operate in distant and environmentally unforgiving locations where it would be extremely dangerous for the United States to deploy teams of special forces to track and capture terrorists. Drones are launched from bases in allied countries and are operated remotely by pilots in the United States, minimizing the risk of injury and death that would occur if ground soldiers and airplane pilots were used instead. Simply put, these strikes have saved lives.” īeyond killing terrorists, that drones are remotely piloted saves US military lives. transit systems, European cities and our troops in Afghanistan. Plots have been disrupted that would have targeted international aviation, U.S. Īccording to President Obama, “ozens of highly skilled al Qaeda commanders, trainers, bomb makers and operatives have been taken off the battlefield. Pro 1 Drone strikes make the United States safer by remotely decimating terrorist networks across the world.ĭrone strikes in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Somalia have killed between 7,665 and 14,247 militants and alleged militants, including high-level commanders implicated in organizing plots against the United States.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |